Re: google stuff

> I'm the tech lead on this project at Google.  Please keep feedback
> (details or big picture) coming on this list, or email me privately.

Thanks for fixing the rdf:Property (was: rdfs:Property) bug so quickly.

But there is another detail: The superclass rdf:Resource does not  
exist - it's rdfs:Resource.

Furthermore, why do none of the "datatype" properties such as  
countryName define a range? rdfs:Literal would clarify that the  
properties cannot point to other resources. Or xsd:string etc.

And the namespace is really weird. Please drop the rdf.xml from the  
namespace.

Finally, all names in this vocabulary should carry rdfs:comments and  
rdfs:labels to make it easier for people to use them in editing tools.

Anyway, it's great to see that Google is starting to support RDF and  
RDFa!

Holger

---
TopQuadrant, Inc.
http://www.topquadrant.com