Re: Updated RDFa-in-text/html tests

Jeni Tennison wrote:
> Ha, good point. This falls into the category of an illegal namespace 
> declaration, which in this case means the prefix is unbound, the Curie 
> illegal, and no triple created. This same kind of reasoning applies, 
> in my opinion, to:
>
>   * "Non-NCName xmlns prefix"
>   * "Colon in prefix"
>   * "Safe CURIE containing square brackets"

I concur.

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com