On Jul 31, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > > Concerning HTML5+RDFa -- there is one more item, spec text for > preserving xmlns: in the non-xml, HTML5 DOM, that needs language added > to the HTML5+RDFa draft. Sorry to latch on to a side point, but - does this mean that HTML5+RDFa will now impose its own additional UA conformance requirements? Regards, MaciejReceived on Friday, 31 July 2009 23:37:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 31 July 2009 23:38:02 GMT