W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > July 2009

Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:21:36 -0500
Message-ID: <4A562720.3030801@aptest.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Julian Reschke wrote:
>
> No, I'm not concerned about the difference to Atom. What I'm concerned 
> with is the difference to RDFa-less XHTML and HTML.
Oh!  Wow.   Well, in that case NOTHING we could ever do would satisfy 
your concern, right?  I mean any interpretation of @rel is by definition 
different than what HTML 4 / XHTML 1 / XHTML 1.1 wold have said.  They 
don't permit any interpretation at all outside of the pre-defined @rel 
values (which RDFa continues to support for that very reason).  Or 
rather, they don't permit the interpretation outside of minting some 
@profile value and therefore interpreting the values in @rel as ANYTHING.

Am I missing something here?


-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 9 July 2009 17:22:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 9 July 2009 17:23:00 GMT