- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:21:36 -0500
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Julian Reschke wrote: > > No, I'm not concerned about the difference to Atom. What I'm concerned > with is the difference to RDFa-less XHTML and HTML. Oh! Wow. Well, in that case NOTHING we could ever do would satisfy your concern, right? I mean any interpretation of @rel is by definition different than what HTML 4 / XHTML 1 / XHTML 1.1 wold have said. They don't permit any interpretation at all outside of the pre-defined @rel values (which RDFa continues to support for that very reason). Or rather, they don't permit the interpretation outside of minting some @profile value and therefore interpreting the values in @rel as ANYTHING. Am I missing something here? -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 9 July 2009 17:22:59 UTC