Re: A proposal for establishing an RDFa IG

Ian Hickson wrote:
> ...
> Nor do I think it's fair to cast the concerns that have been raised 
> regarding RDFa as dubious, and nor am I aware of any serious effort to 
> actually fix all the problems, only some of the more eggregious ones like 
> the use of xmlns="". For example, I'm not aware of any plans to remove the 
> prefix mechanism from RDFa altogether, or replace the URI-based identifier 
> mechanism with something more friendly.
> ...

That may be because there's absolutely no agreement that these aspects 
*are* problematic.

BR, Julian