W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > July 2009

Re: HTML+RDFa Issues (update)

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:19:57 -0500
Message-ID: <4A4CEC3D.2040006@aptest.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>


Sam Ruby wrote:
> My take: while it is possible to construct such examples, in practice 
> they would be rare enough to not be an issue.  That being said, it is 
> nearly impossible to legislate against, as it would require people to 
> avoid declaring namespaces prefix that matches any current or future 
> URI scheme.  Perhaps a "SHOULD avoid well known URI schemes" might be 
> in order.
I like this.  In fact, I am sure we used to have text like that.  Not 
sure why it was removed, but +1 from me! 


-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2009 17:21:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 2 July 2009 17:21:09 GMT