W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > January 2009

RE: XHTML+RDFa and @lang

From: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@thomsonreuters.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:25:54 +0000
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
CC: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, "public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf.w3.org" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>, www-international@w3.org
Message-ID: <A29ADE959C70A1449470AA9A212F5D800B2D54EC@LONSMSXM06.emea.ime.reuters.com>

Do both specs reference BCP 47?  If not, alignment is unlikely.

Misha
 

-----Original Message-----
From: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Shane
McCarron
Sent: 29 January 2009 18:21
To: Tina Holmboe
Cc: Dan Brickley; public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf.w3.org; XHTML WG
Subject: Re: XHTML+RDFa and @lang




Tina Holmboe wrote:
> On 29 Jan, Dan Brickley wrote:
> 
>> Couple of questions -
>>
>> 1. What to say about cases where @lang and @xml:lang have different
content?
> 
>   That would be unfortunate. One would hope authors avoided doing
>   something like it.
> 
>   As for how to handle it ... would it not be logical to say that an
>   HTML UA should take the @lang value as authoritative, and an XHTML
UA
>   should do the same with @xml:lang?

It would... except that we have no standing to say anything about how an

HTML UA behaves.  Of course that is how it would behave in the real 
world.  The guidance to content authors is to ensure that these 
attributes are always both declared and both have the same value if the 
document is to be delivered to HTML and XHTML user agents.

I would probably be comfortable adding "When both attributes are present

on an element, authors SHOULD ensure they have the same value."  Would 
that help?

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com




This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and information company.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Thomson Reuters.
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2009 18:26:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 January 2009 18:26:51 GMT