On Thursday 22 January 2009 12:59:08 Shane McCarron wrote: > It basically has to do with dereferencing the resulting URI when you use > a QName or CURIE (e.g., xsi:lala should dereference to > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance#lala - basically it has to do > with how the resource at the end of the namespace URI is constructed, > and how its components are accessed. If the resource masquerades as a > folder, then http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance/lala will > magically return the description for lala. If it masquerades as a > document, then http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance#lala will > return the complete resource and there will be a ID within that resource > that corresponds to lala. Thanks, but doesn't this explanation just cover the "hash vs. slash" issue? What I was actually wondering about was the case when a namespace URI neither ends with hash nor slash. Suppose xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance", what would xsi:lala expand to? Nothing reasonable, I suppose, so why do such namespace URIs exist? Cheers, Christoph -- Christoph Lange, Jacobs Univ. Bremen, http://kwarc.info/clange, Skype duke4701Received on Saturday, 24 January 2009 22:39:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 24 January 2009 22:39:29 GMT