W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > December 2009

Re: RDFa without using xmlns:

From: Martin McEvoy <martin@weborganics.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:27:05 +0000
Message-ID: <4B1E8C69.9050600@weborganics.co.uk>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
CC: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Toby Inkster wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 14:59 +0000, Martin McEvoy wrote:
>   
>> The json example you provided above seems to be invalid json,
>> (unquoted strings, not key => value pairs ) so I am a little at a loss
>> at what you are attempting to do, so I will guess here is how I would
>> represent your example in json and you tell me what I am missing....
>>     
>
> That's rather my point. The example I posted (which was a quote from the
> RDFj wiki page on Google Code) *cannot* be represented in JSON because
> JSON doesn't have a data type equivalent to Javascript's first-class
> function objects.
>
> Thus RDFj is not JSON - it's Javascript. (Or rather, it uses a format
> that's a subset of Javascript but a superset of JSON.)
>   

Ahh, I see Agreed.


thanks Toby ;)

-- 
Martin McEvoy

WebOrganics http://weborganics.co.uk/
Add to address book: http://transformr.co.uk/hcard/http://weborganics.co.uk/
Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 17:27:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 December 2009 17:27:42 GMT