W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > December 2009

Re: Non-XHTML host languages for RDFa

From: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:01:54 +0100
To: "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>, "Steven Pemberton" <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
Cc: "Mark Birbeck" <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>, "Toby Inkster" <tai@g5n.co.uk>, "RDFa Developers" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.u39ldgslsmjzpq@steven-750g>
On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:43:29 +0100, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>  
wrote:

>
>
> Steven Pemberton wrote:
>>
>> That's the current state of play if you have some SVG in the middle of  
>> some XHTML. SVG defines a different set of keywords to XHTML.
>
> Err... what?  Are you suggesting that RDFa embedded in SVG *today* is  
> using different reserved words than those defined by the default  
> vocabulary?  If so, that would imply that no RDFa processor I know of  
> would raise triples out of that correctly.

It's what the SVG spec says, that's all.

Steven
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 15:02:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 1 December 2009 15:02:48 GMT