W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > December 2009

Re: Non-XHTML host languages for RDFa

From: Christoph LANGE <ch.lange@jacobs-university.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 01:28:46 +0100
To: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, RDFa Developers <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200912010128.47338.ch.lange@jacobs-university.de>
Hi Mark,

  thanks for pointing out the possibilities!

2009-12-01 01:05 Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>:
> > It might be helpful to specify these keywords as a part of an XML schema.
> > (Note: When I use the lowercase word "schema" I mean the general concept,
> > not the particular language XML Schema.)  Think of annotating an XML
> > schema by pointing to classes/properties in an ontology.  Has anything
> > like that ever been done?
> 
> Points we've been considering are whether to use @profile to import
> these mappings, whether RDFa should be used to describe the mappings,
> whether we should map tokens to URIs, or relative paths to URIs,
> whether to use OWL, and so on.

@profile makes a lot of sense to me.  These would then preferably be
profiles describing themselves in RDFa.

Cheers,

Christoph


-- 
Christoph Lange, Jacobs Univ. Bremen, http://kwarc.info/clange, Skype duke4701

Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 00:29:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 1 December 2009 00:29:09 GMT