I was just thinking today how unfair it is that @resource can be a URI or a (safe) CURIE, but that a @rel can only be a CURIE, when it dawned on me that you *can* have a URI in a rel: <head xmlns:http="http"> <link rel="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#next" href="page2.html"/> Worthy of a test methinks. StevenReceived on Monday, 20 April 2009 15:46:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 April 2009 15:46:14 GMT