ISSUE-135: Last Call Comment: rdfs:label

ISSUE-135: Last Call Comment: rdfs:label

http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/135

Raised by: Alistair Miles
On product: SKOS

Raised by Michael Schneider in [1]:

"""
What is the rational for making SKOS labeling properties sub properties of
rdfs:label (besides the common name)? Note that rdfs:Label is an
owl:AnnotationProperty in OWL. While in OWL Full, annotation properties can have
sub properties, it looks at least a little odd (though formally fine) to have a
data property be a sub property of an annotation property. If no strong reasons
talk against, I suggest to /not/ have sub properties of rdfs:label.
"""

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Sep/0044.html