- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:33:57 -0500
- To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- CC: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
You *could* use them in @property, but only if prefixed with a ':'. @property takes a datatype of CURIEs, not "Reserved Word | CURIE" + The RDFa task force decided to not support reserved words in @property - I don't remember why. Steven Pemberton wrote: > > By the way, I see that the vocab document doesn't include any values > for @property. > > HTML4 doesn't list any standard values, but XHTML2 proposes a list of > standard values commonly used today, which need to be officially > blessed I think. > > description Gives a description of the resource. > generator Identifies the software used to generate the resource. > keywords Gives a comma-separated list of keywords describing the > resource. > reference The default value, gives no explicit information about the > relationship with the resource. > robots Gives advisory information intended for automated > web-crawling software. This specification does not define values for > this property. > title Specifies a title for the resource. > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2007/ED-xhtml2-20071024/mod-metaAttributes.html#adef_metaAttributes_property > > > (I think 'reference' is in the wrong place here, and should actually > be in the rel/rev section). > > Additionally the vocab document says that the values are for @rel and > @rev. Although they are principally for use there, I imagine that > there are no obstacles to using them in @property as well. > > Steven > > On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:28:04 +0200, Steven Pemberton > <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: > >> After W3C systeam solved the problem I had with writing to it, I have >> also now updated the base namespace document >> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml >> >> I think all I had to do was add XHTML+RDFa to the list of specs. >> Remind me if there was anything else. >> >> Shane also mentioned that it would be good if we made the vocabulary >> document http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab >> describe the properties in more detail (in particular whether the >> values are for role or RDFa). Might be worth discussing. >> >> In any case I have expunged all references to Namespaces from that >> document (since it isn't one :-) ) >> You might be interested in comments we have on role that relates to >> the vocab document: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html-editor/2008JulSep/0009 >> >> Steven >> >> >> >> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:14:39 +0200, Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org> wrote: >> >>> ACTION: Ralph to make http://www.w3.org/2008/07/rdfa-xslt happen >>> [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/24-rdfa-minutes.html#action05] >>> >>> done >>> >>> ACTION: Shane to update XHTML ns document to point to new XSLT URI >>> [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/24-rdfa-minutes.html#action06] >>> >>> done, specifically http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/Overview.xsd >>> >>> very sorry I put this off for so long. >>> >>> >> >> >> > > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 25 September 2008 13:34:50 UTC