> I think that's more of a question for one of the semweb lists, rather > than here. My guess though, is that this would not work, since it > would also imply that a literal is equivalent to a URI...which simply > cannot be, because fundamental RDF premises say they are not the same. That's what I thought when I had this discussion a while ago, but it was pointed out to me that rdfs:Literal rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource - they are not disjoint. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>Received on Friday, 31 October 2008 22:37:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 31 October 2008 22:37:10 GMT