- From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:24:47 -0400
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>, zimmermann@accesstechnologiesgroup.com, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, wai-liaison@w3.org, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Let's try it this way: Gottfried, Why don't you make your target to file your comments directly without prior PFWG review to <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org> by 4 April. Ben, If any of Gottfried's questions raise in the Task Force mind a question of "is this really necessary for accessibility?" then I suggest a dialog with PFWG on the issue before the RDFa Task Force goes to consensus on a disposition. Shane, Yes, if we were on time, we would prefer to filter the comments through the Group. But in fact we are here imposing on our friends for extra time; and I think Ben and I should implement a process that saves RDFa as much calendar overtime as possible while still enabling a review. Al On 28 Mar 2008, at 5:37 PM, Shane McCarron wrote: > > Well - the W3C process on this is pretty clear. If a working group > wishes to submit last call comments as a working group position, > then the working group needs to approve them. Of course any > individual is free to submit any comments they want. But I assume > Gottfried has been tasked by the PFWG to draft a working group > position, so they need to approve it. > Mark Birbeck wrote: >> Hi Gottfried, Al and Ben, >> >> Great to hear that Gottfried is able to provide a review. >> >> >>> I think i will have something by April 4, but i may not make it >>> to the PF >>> call on April 2. So PF might need until April 9 to review my >>> comments and >>> commit to a agreed version of them. >>> >> >> Speaking as someone who is not very good on the minutiae of W3C >> process, that does sound like an unnecessary formality. After all, Al >> began this thread by saying that the group had only just found a >> reviewer, and with respect to the rest of the group, aren't >> Gottfried's comments going to be most considered...so to speak? >> >> So why can't we just accept all of Gottfried's comments for >> consideration? >> >> Regards, >> >> Mark >> >> > > -- > Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 > Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 > ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com > > >
Received on Friday, 28 March 2008 22:25:40 UTC