Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed

Shane McCarron wrote:
> We cannot use @type I don't think - it is already used in XHTML / XHTML 
> 2 in all sorts of ways - so it would be in conflict in a global 
> attribute.  Sorry!
> 
> Elias Torres wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Dan Brickley wrote:
>>>>>
>>>
>>> I prefer 'typeof' to 'instanceof'. I prefer 'type' to 'typeof'. I 
>>> suspect (monolingually) that single words may be preferable to 
>>> compounds, from an internationalisation perspective.
>>
>> +1 type > typeof > instanceof.
>>
>> I'm sure it was mentioned before, but what about @kind ?
>>
>> -Elias
> 

I know of type being used. I was just repeating the same line of 
preference that Dan Brickley had stated.

-Elias