- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:47:01 -0700
- To: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- CC: Micah Dubinko <mdubinko@yahoo-inc.com>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
John Boyer wrote: > > But could you explain why the spelling "instanceof" is mandatory? You mean why we chose @instanceof specifically? We went through a long (and public) discussion about this. @rdftype was brought up and rejected. Ideally, we would have used @type, but that was taken. And our previous overloading of @class made a few people quite upset. I didn't meant to ignore your comment, by the way, I only meant to wait until the task force members express an opinion on the Thursday call. I responded to Micah's comment because I could do that immediately without consulting the group. We'll chat about it on Thursday and get back to you. -Ben
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:47:39 UTC