W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > March 2008

Re: additional test needed

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:42:19 -0600
Message-ID: <47CC1C5B.3000301@aptest.com>
To: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, "public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf.w3.org" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>

+1

And glad it helped find a bug.  I have identified a bunch of other edge 
conditions like this we could create tests for.  I will try to write 
them up.

Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
> Ivan, 
>
> Thanks for submitting these new TC! I've now a added them as TC92-TC94;
> as usual to be found at [1].
>
> Cheers,
> 	Michael
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>  Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
>  Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
>  JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
>   
>  http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>  
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org 
>> [mailto:public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ivan Herman
>> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 3:01 PM
>> To: Shane McCarron
>> Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf.w3.org
>> Subject: Re: additional test needed
>>
>> Shane (et al)
>>
>> I have attached 3 additional tests along the line of what Shane says. 
>> They are all variants of #11:
>>
>> - 1.xhtml: specified an explicit xml:XMLLiteral datatype (the result 
>> should be the same as #11)
>>
>> - 2.xhml: changing 1.xhtml and using a different namespace 
>> (example.org) 
>> instead of the rdf one for the XMLLiteral, result should be a 
>> plain literal
>>
>> - 3.xhtml: the same as 1.xhtml, but using an unusual prefix 
>> (instead of 
>> 'rdf'). Th result should be the same as 1.xhtml.
>>
>> And... the first test did catch a bug in my implementation!:-) Ie, the 
>> test _does_ make sense:-)
>>
>> Ivan
>>
>> Shane McCarron wrote:
>>     
>>> I actually didn't realize test 11 exercised the funcitonality un til 
>>> Manu pointed it out (privately).  However, yes - since there 
>>>       
>> is explicit 
>>     
>>> text about dealing with XMLLiteral as a specified datatype, 
>>>       
>> I think a 
>>     
>>> copy of test 11 that did that might be good.  Might I suggest that 
>>> instead of using the prefix "rdf" we use something else?  
>>>       
>> That way if an 
>>     
>>> implementation mistakenly is testing for the literal 
>>>       
>> "rdf:XMLLiteral" it 
>>     
>>> would fail the test.
>>>
>>> Ivan Herman wrote:
>>>       
>>>> I am not sure what you want to test. We do have test #11 to 
>>>>         
>> see if the 
>>     
>>>> generated literal is indeed xml literal.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe the only additional variant of this test could be when the 
>>>> datatype is explicitly set to XMLLiteral (instead of relying on the 
>>>> @datatype="" and the recognition that the children do 
>>>>         
>> indeed include 
>>     
>>>> xml tags, which is test #11). Ie, Test #11 seems to be 
>>>>         
>> *more* than the 
>>     
>>>> basic XML Literal generation.
>>>>
>>>> Shane, is this what you were referring to, or was there 
>>>>         
>> more that you 
>>     
>>>> thought of?
>>>>
>>>> Ivan
>>>>
>>>> Shane McCarron wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> Looking through the current tests I dont see any that exercise the 
>>>>> RDF datatype XMLLiteral - we probably need some?
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>> -- 
>>
>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>>
>>     

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Monday, 3 March 2008 15:42:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:27 UTC