W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > June 2008

Re: quick ping - ISSUE-104

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:17:35 -0500
Message-ID: <485675FF.4060207@aptest.com>
To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
CC: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org

Sorry, I misunderstood your request.  We have defined the lexical and 
value space for CURIEs in the CURIE spec itself 
(http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Drafts#curie for the latest draft).   For a 
variety of reasons the RDFa spec does not reference the CURIE spec.  If 
I understand your request, you would like the text about CURIE lexical 
and value space copied into the RDFa specification.  Is that correct?

Jonathan Rees wrote:
>
> Thanks for the pointer. I looked at:
>
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-rdfa-syntax-20080616
>
> and did not find anything at the level of detail of
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/#QName
>
> and specifically nothing saying what the lexical and value spaces of 
> CURIE or URIorSafeCURIE are - in fact the strings "lexical space" and 
> "value space" don't even occur in the RDFa draft.
>
> Your issue notes say only that you copied the datatype definition from 
> the CURIE document, not that you examined the XML Schema WD to 
> determine what's required in introducing a new datatype, which 
> apparently you either didn't do or decided was overkill. But I really 
> think you need to say what the lexical and value spaces are for the 
> new datatypes in Appendix B, even if it's only to reference some other 
> part of the document or some other document.
>
> I think I'm just repeating one of the concerns raised in the TAG's 
> comments on the CURIE draft - this came originally from Henry 
> Thompson, if I remember correctly.
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Jun 16, 2008, at 7:36 AM, Shane McCarron wrote:
>
>> We always had two datatypes.  As to drafts, the current editors draft 
>> is always available via http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Drafts#rdfa-syntax - 
>> sorry for the confusion.
>>
>> Jonathan Rees wrote:
>>>
>>> Regarding datatype definition - what draft should I be checking now? 
>>> When I google for your draft all I can find is the 21 February version.
>>>
>>> You did create two datatypes, one for CURIEs and another for 
>>> URIorSafeCURIE ? I hope?
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>> On Jun 16, 2008, at 1:24 AM, Ben Adida wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jonathan,
>>>>
>>>> If you can let me know ASAP your response to ISSUES 104 and 105, 
>>>> that would be great:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/104
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/105
>>>>
>>>> (on the mailing list would be ideal:
>>>> public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org)
>>>>
>>>> -Ben
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
>> Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
>> ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
>>
>>
>

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Monday, 16 June 2008 14:18:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 16 June 2008 14:19:00 GMT