Re: quick ping - ISSUE-105

Thank you for making these editorial changes, especially for  
URIorSafeCURIE.

I'm disappointed in your decision to not change "recurse" to "recur".  
I'm wondering what precedent you considered in doing this - your  
experience of "conventional" seems to be different from mine. I've  
usually seen "recurse" in email and discussion groups, and second-rate  
publications, but not in writings from reputable, literate authors and  
publishers. But it's been a long time since I've followed the computer  
science literature, so things may have degraded. I just hate to see  
this kind of noise and irregularity enter the language.

Jonathan

On Jun 16, 2008, at 1:24 AM, Ben Adida wrote:

> Jonathan,
>
> If you can let me know ASAP your response to ISSUES 104 and 105,  
> that would be great:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/104
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/105
>
> (on the mailing list would be ideal:
> public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org)
>
> -Ben