Michael Bolger wrote: > Shane McCarron wrote: > >This is a W3C effort, and the W3C has not defined that behavior > > Not to be a "smart as_", shouldn't they have finished that already? Finished what already? No one is charged with defining RDFa in terms of HTML. I suppose someone could suggest a formal W3C work item, or submit a proposal as a Note or something, but until there is a formal task no standards organization is going to just do something - there's plenty of other work to do. And for what its worth, we are "they". > > > michael bolger > > > > > > > > > Shane McCarron wrote: >> >> While I agree that it is physically possible... there is no profile, >> it is not valid, it requires the use of XML Namespaces, etc. It is >> not something that the HTML community would ever have agreed to. You >> parsers might swallow it, but that doesn't mean it is something we >> should encourage. This is a W3C effort, and the W3C has not defined >> that behavior. >> >> Jeremy Carroll wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 16 Jul 2008, at 06:21, Shane McCarron wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> This is a global comment - if you need more specifics I can do that >>>> but I hope this will be good enough. The Primer talks about HTML. >>>> That's very very bad. We don't define anything for HTML. >>>> Anywhere. Misleading people into thinking they can annotate their >>>> HTML 4 documents with RDFa is not good for 2 reasons. >>> >>> >>> They can; it is not misleading. >>> >>> (I am not trying to grind an axe here ... merely reporting that, for >>> example, both Jena's support and TopQuadrant's support for RDFa >>> starts off by applying tidy to the input which means that HTML 4 >>> docs get converted into XHTML and everything works at a practical >>> level - it might not be chapter and verse conformant, but it is >>> practically useful) >>> >>> Jeremy >>> >>> >>> >> -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.comReceived on Wednesday, 16 July 2008 15:47:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 16 July 2008 15:47:01 GMT