W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > February 2008

RE: profile attributes

From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:09:56 +0100
Message-ID: <768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852014EB214@RZJC2EX.jr1.local>
To: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>
Cc: "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>, "W3C RDFa task force" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>


Ben,

Ok. Some random? One/some additional ones? (How about Ivan's proposed
TC, like
'a tribute to Ivan' ;)

Seriously, I am with you, but dunno what you mean with 'some of them'.

Cheers,
	Michael

----------------------------------------------------------
 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
 Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA
---------------------------------------------------------- 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Adida [mailto:ben@adida.net] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 5:54 PM
> To: Hausenblas, Michael
> Cc: Ivan Herman; W3C RDFa task force
> Subject: Re: profile attributes
> 
> Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
> >> I think it would be more in line with our own syntax if 
> all tests had 
> >> the profile attribute set... What do you think?
> > 
> > +1
> 
> I'm okay with some of them having it, but not with all. 
> Otherwise, that implies that a parser that ignores XHTML+RDFa 
> documents without @profile is compliant, and I disagree with 
> that interpretation.
> 
> -Ben
> 
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2008 18:10:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 6 February 2008 18:10:33 GMT