- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:09:56 +0100
- To: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>, "W3C RDFa task force" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Ben, Ok. Some random? One/some additional ones? (How about Ivan's proposed TC, like 'a tribute to Ivan' ;) Seriously, I am with you, but dunno what you mean with 'some of them'. Cheers, Michael ---------------------------------------------------------- Michael Hausenblas, MSc. Institute of Information Systems & Information Management JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA ---------------------------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Adida [mailto:ben@adida.net] > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 5:54 PM > To: Hausenblas, Michael > Cc: Ivan Herman; W3C RDFa task force > Subject: Re: profile attributes > > Hausenblas, Michael wrote: > >> I think it would be more in line with our own syntax if > all tests had > >> the profile attribute set... What do you think? > > > > +1 > > I'm okay with some of them having it, but not with all. > Otherwise, that implies that a parser that ignores XHTML+RDFa > documents without @profile is compliant, and I disagree with > that interpretation. > > -Ben >
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2008 18:10:32 UTC