W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > August 2008

RE: RDFa JavaScript Library

From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:26:30 +0200
Message-ID: <768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D2985201824735@RZJC2EX.jr1.local>
To: "Elias Torres" <elias@torrez.us>, "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>
Cc: "RDFa" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>


Elias, Ben,

Thanks a lot! Will be integrated in the RDFa IR *very* soon :)

Cheers,
	Michael

----------------------------------------------------------
 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
  
 http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
----------------------------------------------------------
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org 
>[mailto:public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
>Elias Torres
>Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 5:14 PM
>To: Ben Adida
>Cc: RDFa
>Subject: Re: RDFa JavaScript Library
>
>Similarly, I'm 84/98. Attached is my earl report, if it's still time
>and it helps the IR.
>
>-Elias
>
>On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> So I fixed a couple of edge-case bugs in my RDFa JavaScript library
>> (good test cases!), and am now passing 85/98. The 13 failed 
>test cases
>> break down as follows:
>>
>>
>> TC 11: likely SPARQL bug (UNION)
>>
>> TC 42: likely test harness bug (negative result)
>>
>> TC 86: likely test harness bug (negative result)
>>
>> TC 92: likely SPARQL bug (UNION)
>>
>> TC 94: likely SPARQL bug (UNION)
>>
>> TC 99: likely SPARQL bug (\n vs. actual newline)
>>
>> TC 100: same canonical XML, it actually works.
>>
>> TC 101: same canonical XML, it actually works.
>>
>> TC 102: same canonical XML, it actually works.
>>
>> TC 103: same canonical XML, it actually works.
>>
>> TC 107: test harness bug (negative result)
>>
>> TC 108: likely SPARQL bug (white space)
>>
>> TC 112: likely SPARQL bug (white space)
>>
>>
>> In other words, as far as I can tell, the parser is doing the right
>> thing in all test cases. However, I'm not super concerned 
>about getting
>> an "official" score that's higher than 85/98, I just wanted 
>to be sure
>> there was no core problem and the test harness wasn't giving 
>me a higher
>> score than I deserved :)
>>
>> I've frozen the library:
>> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/impl/js/20080817/
>>
>> You can re-create the EARL report here:
>> http://torrez.us/code/rdfa-js/tests/
>>
>> by using the following RDFa test runner:
>> 
>http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/impl/js/20080817/rdfa-testrunner.js
>>
>> The parser itself is at:
>> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/impl/js/20080817/rdfa.js
>>
>>
>> And of course I'm attaching the EARL report if you don't 
>want to do it
>> yourself. It's worth noting that this applies in *Firefox 
>only* for now.
>> Other browsers should be close behind, but I'll test them 
>another time.
>>
>> -Ben
>>
>>
>
Received on Monday, 18 August 2008 15:32:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:29 UTC