Re: CR-rdfa-syntax comment on section 2.1 @name

I think this is correct - we have no rules for generating triples using 
@name.

KANZAKI Masahide wrote:
> Hi,
> sorry for this late comment.
>
> I wonder it is misleading to mention @name in section 2.1 of the
> Syntax document, which implies that @name generates a predicate in
> RDFa. AFAIK, @name in meta element should be just ignored in RDFa.
>
> (Sorry again if this was already pointed out and resolved.)
>
> cheers,
>
>   

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com