Re: Comments on RDFa in XHTML Syntax draft [ISSUE-109]

From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:08:08 -0700 Message-ID: <4817FEB8.9050304@adida.net> To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl> · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 April 2008 05:08:49 GMT

Laurens,

We formally considered the issue you brought up regarding @cite, which 
is ISSUE-109:

http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/109

Our resolution was along the lines of what Mark already mentioned in his 
email: we considered @cite but realized that many other attributes would 
then require RDFa interpretation and that doing so is not simple. We 
chose to defer this issue to a future version of RDFa.

Let us know if that is an acceptable resolution for you, as far as RDFa 
1.0 is concerned.

Thanks,

-Ben