Elias Torres wrote: > > I had sent an email asking to consider @kind as it picked up more > interest. > > Is it too late? or did it get rejected at one of the meetings? Yup, it was circulated earlier today: http://www.w3.org/2008/04/03-rdfa-minutes.html#item02 via http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Apr/0036.html RESOLUTION: change @instanceof to @typeof It seems 'kind' was discussed. I quite like it, but 'typeof' is fine; I welcome the change. Dan > > On Apr 3, 2008, at 5:58 PM, Shane McCarron wrote: >> >> As per my action item earlier today, I have updated the editors draft >> to reflect the resolution that the name @instanceof be changed to >> @typeof. I have also updated the DTD. Note that until >> implementations and the test cases are updated, things will not >> validate! >> >> Draft is at http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-rdfa-syntax-20080403/ >> >> -- >> Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 >> Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 >> ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com >> >> >> > >Received on Friday, 4 April 2008 00:30:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 4 April 2008 00:30:31 GMT