Re: an issue with prefix-less curies (also comment on the syntax document)

Hi Ivan,

> Mark (and others), I would propose to try to get that done in the syntax
> document as soon as possible, maybe before Amsterdam.

Good idea.

Since the '#' technique is already in the syntax document, and since
it is the easiest to configure, my vote would be to stick with that
approach.

Which means that all we're discussing is that we need to replace the
actual URI with one that has the word 'relations' in it, in the same
way that we did with 'datatypes' in XHTML M12N.

I'll raise that on the XHTML 2 call today. Unfortunately Steven won't
be there, but I'll see what Shane and the others think, and then
perhaps we can follow up on this on tomorrow's RDFa call.

The only issue I can foresee--assuming of course that people accept
the benefits of having a different URI--is that in XHTML M12N we use a
'/' at the end of the datatypes definition. However, since that
document is still a working draft, and since that URI is (for now)
only used internally in the schemas, I'll propose that we consider
changing that to use '#' also.

Regards,

Mark

-- 
  Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer

  mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
  http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com

  standards. innovation.

Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2007 11:18:11 UTC