Simone Onofri wrote: > > If I understand the problem properly, there is very little that can be >> done here from our point of view. Indeed, afaik, the RSS specification >> uses a _restricted_ version of RDF/XML. I think that the fact that my >> distiller produces something acceptable by the RSS validators is, though >> flattering:-), just a pure coincidence. > > Good coicidence :-) and yes, this is the problem. I hope there are few > cases with same issue. I'll continue testing on others things to find. > Well, this is an issue of RSS:-( Put it another way, RSS is _not_ a good use case for RDFa:-( It is a good example for GRDDL because a specialized GRDDL transform for RSS has an exact control over the output format. I. >> tomorrow, I would upgrade the underlying RDFLib package which would >> produce a slightly different RDF/XML serialization (though identical in >> the RDF sense) that would not pass an RSS validator any more.Ie, I >> think Fabien is right that this is not possible with a generic >> extractor/distiller/parser. :-( > > Thanks for reply, Ivan. > > Cheers, > > Simone > >> Ivan >> -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2007 08:52:10 UTC