Re: VOTING on the non-binding resolutions - please read and respond ASAP

Hi!

Here are my easy ones.

> 2) @id does *not* play a role in RDFa triple generation.

+1 [it is safe and straightforward enough - albeit less DRY in some cases]

> 3) @rel, @rev, and @instanceof cause chaining (aka striping), whether or
> not there is @href/@resource on the element.

+1

Best regards,
Niklas


On 9/20/07, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> In July, Mark, Ralph and I agreed on some "non-binding resolutions" [1]
> so we could move things along. The rationale was:
>
> > Why non-binding? Because we were only 3 on the call and the resolutions
> > will be best achieved by *trying* them out in actual implementations,
> > rather than theorizing on them endlessly.
>
> Now that we've tried these out in implementations and specifications,
> it's time to vote on them. Unless there's significant controversy, email
> should be enough. Please send +1 or -1 with explanation to each of the
> following points.
>
> 1) @instanceof is the attribute name for rdf:type
>
> 2) @id does *not* play a role in RDFa triple generation.
>
> 3) @rel, @rev, and @instanceof cause chaining (aka striping), whether or
> not there is @href/@resource on the element.
>
>
> As best as I can tell, all of these are in agreement with the current
> documents. The main issue *not* covered here is whether @instanceof
> applies to @resource or @about when both are present (and we'll handle
> that in a separate thread.)
>
> -Ben
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Jul/0209
>
>

Received on Thursday, 20 September 2007 12:04:59 UTC