Shane McCarron wrote: > > The following issues were raised during the brief review period: > > 1. There is no section on conformance. We must have one of these. > 2. Manu mentioned that xml:base should work. I think we resolved > that it cannot. Can someone confirm that? > 3. SAX Processing - is there a formal reference for the definition of > that somewhere? > 4. What datatypes are allowed to be specified? > 5. What is the definition of canonicalization in the context of RDFa? > 6. What should happen if there is no prefix on an attribute value > that takes a CURIE? > 7. Finalize the @instanceof behaviour 8. Decision on whether we use @lang or not Ivan > That's all I have seen to date. > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:12 GMT