Re: rdfa-syntax First Public Working Draft is up!

No problem at all, it is an 'edge' case (all missing things are...)...

Thanks Shane

ivan

Shane McCarron wrote:
> Ivan Herman wrote:
>> - the current document still lists a set of predefined values for
>> @property; if I am not mistaken the group has decided that we would not
>> have those. This is important because it affects the @rel/@property
>> values without qualified names. Are there still open issues with those?
>>   
> The discussion went all over the place, and I didn't dare rip them out
> until I had a clear resolution to the whole thing (rel/rev, XHTML
> non-prefixed values, etc.).  Some of those values are useful and should
> be held onto.  Also, we need input from the XHTML 2 working group on
> this, since it is really their list in the first place.
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf