Re: PROPOSAL: Extending @rel/@rev reserved value set

Shane McCarron wrote:
> 
> As per today's discussion, I would like to propose that we 1) merge the
> reserved values from @property in [1] into the set of reserved values
> for @rel / @rev in [2].

Unless I'm misunderstanding, that would imply adding to the list of
currently reserved words for @rel/@rev. That seems to be in conflict
with our approach of not extending the host language?

-Ben