- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:53:23 -0700
- To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Michael, > + Is there deliberately no reference to the > RDFa use cases document [1] in the Primer? No deliberate act there. I've added a reference in Section 1. > + I tried to run the Primer through the pubrule > checker [2] - it fails. Maybe to early? Too early, but good to know that we'll need to double-check that. > + There are still now and then terms used in > the Primer (as 'web') that should be written > according to [3] fixed "web", I don't see other terms for now, but let me know if you find others. > + The 'Changes' section should be at the very bottom > of the document (IMHO this is good practice, but > no strict requirement) done. > + Minor editorial issues (typos, etc.): > > - Sec. 2.2, second-last paragraph 'etc...' I believe that would be correct in French (and likely German?), but in English, etc. is not followed by an ellipsis, as far as I understand. If someone wants to correct me on that, happy to :) > - Heading of sec. 3 currently reads > '3 Advanced Concepts: Custom Vocabularies, Document Fragments, > Complex Data, ...' > Can we find a more concise title, here? Let met know if you can find one :) > - In sec. 5 there is a link to rdfa.info (case studies). > Could we also link to the (already with existing content) > http://rdfa.info/rdfa-in-the-wild/? I'd rather not have too many links to internal pages, just in case we re-organize rdfa.info at some point. -Ben
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:53:34 UTC