Shane McCarron (8 oct. 2007 - 21:30) : > If it were me, I would trigger on the DOCTYPE - there is only one > legal, valid way s/legal//. Nothing legal. > to deliver RDFa today - XHTML+RDFa, which is a specialization of > XHTML 1.1. And sent as application/xhtml+xml, which means given [browsers market share][1] working in 22% browsers only (September 2007) > We do have a profile value, and it might be possible to do > something with that as well. What is the plan of XHTML 2.0 and profile attributes? It seems to [be dropped][2]. It has also been dropped from [HTML 5][3]. btw, what's happening if an RDFa document (XHTML 1.1) is sent over HTTP with a wrong mime-type (aka text/html)? [1]: http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=0 [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/attributes.html [3]: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/ -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2007 02:36:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:15 GMT