W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > November 2007

Re: Understanding 'chaining'

From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:34:48 +0000
Message-ID: <a707f8300711271334l686dec74hf2076c894691706c@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Manu Sporny" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>

Hi Manu,

When I get the chance I will reply to Ivan's post, but in the
meantime, could I just respond to this:

> This approach [Ivan's creation of two new attributes] certainly is a
> welcome addition to resolving this deadlock... as it feels that we
> aren't really moving forward with the current proposals.

Why do you say that? Up until the recent posts, I had thought things
were going pretty well:

 * myself and Ben had reduced our 'differences' very precisely to the
behaviour of
   one attribute in one position;

 * I'd explained how the way that Ben was approaching things was incredibly
   close to how they were a while ago, and that a small tweak to
maintain symmetry
   in the behaviour of @rel/@rev would give us every use-case we wanted;

 * Ben replied that he thought we might be close to a resolution, but asked for
   some clarification on some edge-cases;

 * I clarified those, and was waiting for Ben's reply.

That doesn't sound like deadlock to me. Of course it might be, but I
think we should give Ben a bit of space to reply before throwing our
hands up, and declaring game over.

Regards,

Mark

-- 
  Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer

  mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
  http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com

  standards. innovation.
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2007 21:35:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:18 GMT