I have updated the draft. However, note that its not RDFa documents, it is XHTML + RDFa documents. This spec defines a single class of documents - XHTML + RDFa. There is certainly room for defining additional classes of documents, although where is something the task force needs to address. Sean B. Palmer wrote: > "XHTML 1.1 documents SHOULD be labeled with the Internet Media Type > "application/xhtml+xml" as defined in [RFC3236]." > - http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-rdfa-syntax-20071018/#docconf > > This should, presumably, say "RDFa documents SHOULD [etc.]". > > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.comReceived on Friday, 23 November 2007 20:45:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:18 GMT