Re: PROPOSAL: Using @resource to define objects that are resources

Keith Alexander wrote:
> 
> On a related note, can anyone confirm that @content is intended purely
> for machine-readable content? (ie: will it suffer the same problems as
> using @title  has in microformats, or not?)

Yes, it is intended purely for machine-readable content. It is there for
those cases where we must sadly give up on DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself),
e.g. on timestamps, and have different machine-readable and
human-readable versions of the data.

-Ben