W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > July 2007

Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42)

From: Knud Hinnerk Möller <knud.moeller@deri.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:23:11 +0100
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Message-id: <0EFCF6C1-AF6E-4438-B03B-13AD219B8D45@deri.org>

Am 30.07.2007 um 18:03 schrieb Dan Brickley:

> Knud Hinnerk Möller wrote:
>> ...
>> I would really argue to have bnodes in RDFa: I know they are very  
>> unpopular, and vocabularies like FOAF now recommend against using  
>> them.
>
> No they don't :) well, foaf in particular...
>
> I put a #me into the FOAF spec example, that's all.

Ooopps. Someone (don't even remember who) told me "foaf now urges you  
to not use bnodes!" and I just passed that half-knowledge on. That's  
how rumors get started! :)

Knud

-------------------------------------------------
Knud Möller, MA
+353 - 91 - 495086
Smile Group: http://smile.deri.ie

Digital Enterprise Research Institute
   National University of Ireland, Galway
Institiúid Taighde na Fiontraíochta Digití
   Ollscoil na hÉireann, Gaillimh



Received on Monday, 30 July 2007 17:23:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:08 GMT