Ben Adida wrote: > Ivan Herman wrote: >> - the element's corresponding RDF identity is the subject of an >> @property when it appears (the object of which follows the usual rules) > > I don't think so.... but let's hash it out. > > What does this mean: > > <div id="me" property="foo:bar">foo</div> > > I think @id doesn't set the subject. I think @property follows normal > @about resolution, noting that @rel, @rev, and @instanceof implicitly > set up @about for contained content. > Well, apart from the possible danger of using @id for its side effect, what is wrong with this? Ie, that this means a property on 'me'? B.t.w.: my rule description of collections/containers go wrong if we do not use this rule. This is not necessary a good argument, but, nevertheless... >> - the @src of <img> and the @data of <object> are, in this algorithms, >> aliases to @href > > More or less: we haven't resolved what happens if you have IMG with > @href and @src.... but yeah, that's more or less the way to think about it. > Ah, yes. so we have to put @src into the cascade of priorities in your rule description somewhere... (before or after href) ivan > -Ben -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:08 GMT