Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type)

Steven Pemberton wrote:
> I think there are only 3 reasons why I think 'instanceof' is a bad choice:
> 

And to bolster this argument, I have some feedback from folks
implementing RDFa that "instanceof" is too programmatic, not HTML-y
enough. So I wouldn't be opposed to something else, though I can't say
I'm enthralled by any of the other options yet.

-Ben