I am on record not being really favourable of the href everywhere, but as the WG has decided to do it, I am in favour of Ben's proposal (@resource overriding @href). Ivan Ben Adida wrote: > > Hi all, > > Today, we agreed that we would support @href *and* @resource everywhere, > with the following note: > > - @href may become navigable/clickable in a future version of XHTML > - we encourage X/HTML WGs to *not* make @resource clickable/navigable. > - from an RDFa standpoint, they both determine the object of a triple > (or the subject under a @rev). > > The question, then, is what to do when *both* @resource and @href > appear. > > I have a proposal, which I think makes sense and provides solid > justification for having both attributes: @resource overrides @href just > like @content overrides the content of an element. > > Effectively, this joins up with Mark's reasoning that @resource is used > when the navigable link is not really the semantic link. If there is a > clickable and semantic link, use @href. If there is only a semantic > link, use @resource. If there's both but they're not the same, use both > attributes accordingly. > > Thoughts? > > -Ben > > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:08 GMT