Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa

I disagree. I think we should instead copy in the relevant part of the
CURIEs spec, and then in the future we can make use of it. (That's
what we agreed at the end of the last call.)

On 13/07/07, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote:
>
> We could... I think conventional wisdom says don't make your research
> dependent on someone else's research. Copy it in, give credit to them,
> and then we are not hooked to their path to Rec.
>
> Ivan Herman wrote:
> > What about referring back to the SPARQL use, instead of inventing our own?
> >
> > ivan
> >
> > Ben Adida wrote:
> >
> >> Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
> >>
> >>> That's exactly what I was asking and advocating in the first place.
> >>>
> >> Excellent, sorry I didn't hear you out correctly.
> >>
> >> -Ben
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
> Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
> ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
  Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer

  mark.birbeck@x-port.net | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
  http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com

  standards. innovation.

Received on Friday, 13 July 2007 20:04:45 UTC