W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > July 2007

Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type

From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 13:13:50 +0200
To: "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tuzn5cvtsmjzpq@acer3010.lan>

On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 12:49:47 +0200, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

>> Against class:
>>     Special rule for namespaced/non-namespaced values
>>     Confusion/objection by/upset for current class users
>>     Used by microformats in a similar way

> I am not sure why this would be counted as a counter argument...

Don't tread on other people's toes. It is only similar, and varies from  
microformat to microformat, so the similarity is not close.

>> Against role:
>>     Potential conflict with WAI use of role needs to be resolved

> My question: is the WAI the only possible conflict? What will be the
> future evolution of @role in XHTML2? Is this predictable?

This discussion is part of that.

Steven
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2007 11:14:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:08 GMT