Dan, > I see lots of focus on test metadata and test infrastructure, > which is great, but unless I'm missing something, there aren't any > actual tests that are complete yet, right? Kind of. As this was an _intermediate_ report, these are _intermediate_ results, etc. I just wanted to flag the progress and express that it looks doable to meet the 26 Feb 2007 deadline, right? > I suggest a shift in priority toward getting one or two test > cases finished before doing more work on infrastructure. > > The first few examples from the primer seem like an important > thing to test. I tend to disagree. As of [1] we agreed to develop the test cases in a integral way. So, for each section in the RDFa Syntax doc [2] there will be a single test assertions realised through a so called Conformance Query (SPARQL ASK query) that, when executed on the resulting RDF graph, the answer MUST yield 'YES'. Please Note: Not Primer but Syntax is the base, and _for each_ section or 'production rule case' there will be a single test assertion; cf. also [3] Dan, was this too confusing now, or did it 'help'? Karl, any thoughts? Cheers, Michael [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/02/05-htmltf-minutes.html#item03 [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/syntax/ [3] http://code.wingerz.com/rdfatests/coverage.txt ---------------------------------------------------------- Michael Hausenblas, MSc. Institute of Information Systems & Information Management JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA ----------------------------------------------------------Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:52:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:03 GMT