On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:51:13 +0100, Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us> wrote: > Steven Pemberton wrote: >> >> On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:57:10 +0100, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> wrote: >> >>> Yes, we've seen this, too, which is why all of the examples no longer >>> use LINK and META outside of the HEAD. >>> >>> Basically, we're working on having all of RDFa implementable using only >>> extra attributes, since such extra attributes are supposed to be >>> ignored >>> by browser, as per the HTML spec, and in fact other tools (the Dojo >>> toolkit) use custom attributes already and the browsers don't mind. >> >> Ha! I'd missed that. Good idea. >> >> How about: >> >> <p> >> <span role="meta" property="title">XHTML<sup>tm</sup> Basic</span> >> ... >> </p> > > Why do we need role="meta"? Is it for reification purposes, etc? > >> >> and >> >> <p> >> <span role="link" rel="index" href="p-index.html"/> >> ... >> </p> > > Why not just use the fact that @href is there? > > It's snowing outside, so forgive me if I'm missing something. :) The standard rule for @rel and @property is that you look for the closest @about above in the tree, or otherwise use the document as the about. For meta and link is was different; the about was the parent element (unless there was an explicit about on the link or meta). StevenReceived on Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:57:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:22 UTC