W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > December 2007

Re: CURIE syntax thoughts + @instanceof semantics

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 16:42:47 +0100
Message-ID: <47654777.9070203@w3.org>
To: W3C RDFa task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Doh, my mailer (or me) made some funny things, and cut some words which
may have made something unreadable. Sorry about that, here is what I
wanted to say:

Ivan Herman wrote:
[snip]
> 
> outstanding and somewhat muddy issue. So what if, instead, we say:
> 
> - accept the CURIE edge cases #1 and #2
>  an abbreviation for- there is _no_ exception for @instanceof, ie, it
> behaves _exactly_ like <... @rel="rdf:type" @resource="THE TYPE CURIE"/>
> 

Should be

- accept the CURIE edge cases #1 and #2
- there is _no_ exception for @instanceof, ie, it behaves _exactly_ like
<... @rel="rdf:type" @resource="THE TYPE CURIE"/>

Sorry about that

Ivan

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf


Received on Sunday, 16 December 2007 15:42:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:19 GMT