W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > August 2007

RE: How to handle a Test Suite at W3C Re: Error in (approved) test 0009

From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 09:04:45 +0200
Message-ID: <768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D2985201255CB9@RZJC2EX.jr1.local>
To: "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "W3C RDFa task force" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, <www-qa@w3.org>


Ivan,

>This discussion is really useful for the general picture. But 
>let us not overadministrate ourself.

Agree :)

>The bug in this test is an absolute clear case
>of misspelling, so to say, it is not _at all_ a technically
>controversial case and I would not be particularly worried about
>changing the test without further notice in that case.

Agree, again :)

>But the situation is not always that easy. My report on test #29:
>
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Aug/0033
.html
>
>_does_ require some more disciplined procedure indeed.

Right. That's why I did not reply so far; that's why it is
still unreviewed [1], and finally that's why we are going to 
(at least) review TC29-33 in the upcoming telecon - hopefully :)

Cheers,
	Michael

[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFaTC#Approval_2007-08-02

----------------------------------------------------------
 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
  
 http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
----------------------------------------------------------
 
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2007 07:03:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:09 GMT