Le 19 avr. 2007 à 20:10, Dan Brickley a écrit : > Karl Dubost wrote: >> We might issue a warning on this. Saying be careful you have a >> conflict between the meta name and the http headers for your mime >> type. > > Is it really a conflict? Can a piece of content not genuinely fall > in two categories at once? Or is the rule that, even if this is > true in the abstract, ... for each HTTP transaction, there must be > exactly one mime type for the content. 1. The HTTP mime type MUST have precedence on everything else. So what is proposed is a hack relying on an implementation bug. 2. I said warning, not error. See CUAP http://www.w3.org/TR/cuap -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Thursday, 19 April 2007 11:34:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:04 GMT