W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > April 2007

RE: [RDFa TC] First step regarding partitioning (XHTML 1.1)

From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:01:53 +0200
Message-ID: <768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D29852010DED4F@RZJC2EX.jr1.local>
To: "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>
Cc: <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>


Thanks, Shane!

http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/0001.xhtml

validates now ;)

Cheers,
	Michael

----------------------------------------------------------
 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
  
 http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
----------------------------------------------------------
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org 
>[mailto:public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
>Hausenblas, Michael
>Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 12:42 PM
>To: Shane McCarron; Wing C Yung
>Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
>Subject: [RDFa TC] First step regarding partitioning (XHTML 1.1)
>Importance: High
>
>
>
>Shane, Wing,
>
>I now started to init the partitioning of the RDFa TC,
>available at [1]; the first step in the TC repository
>has been made [2].
>
>Note: Currently we are only after the XHTML 1.1 subset of the TCs!
>
>What I did so far was that I took  
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/000002.html
>
>from the old TC repository, which is now
>
> 
>http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/0001.html
>
>and changed the document type to
>
><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML+RDFa 1.0//EN"
>"http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-rdfa-1.dtd">
>
>tried to validate it with 
>
> http://validator.w3.org/detailed.html
>
>and it does NOT validate :(
>
>@Shane: Can you give advise on this, please?
>
>@Wing:
> 1. Please note that I cut down the potential number of
> TC to a max. of 1000, hence it is e.g. 0001 (and not 000001, 
>any more).
>
> 2. IMHO it is now the time to re-number all the TC, starting from 0001
>-
> this is why 000002 now became 0001.
>
> 3. I'm not sure if you already aware of the changes w.r.t 
>XMLLiteral as
>of [3].
> Can you please check that the new TC reflect these changes?
>
> Wing, can you please flag if you are (or if you are not:) 
>available for
>this, ASAP.
>
>
>Cheers,
>	Michael
>
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/
>[2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/
>[3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa/LiteralObject
>
>----------------------------------------------------------
> Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
> Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
> JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
> Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA
>
> <office>
>    phone: +43-316-876-1193 (fax:-1191)   
>   e-mail: michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at
>      web: http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ 
>
> <private>
>   mobile: +43-660-7621761
>      web: http://www.sw-app.org/ 
>----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2007 13:58:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:04 GMT